Archive
Contracts

20120523-204923.jpg
SUREFIRE has upgraded a few key features of the suppressor being purchased by SOCOM as part of their carbine signature reduction program. After SOCOM awarded the 5.56mm portion of the contract to SUREFIRE, the company redesigned the muzzle interface, the front plate and tweaked the baffle system.

SUREFIRE’s Don Alexander explained the updates to the 556-RC suppressor came as engineering change proposals to the existing design as the company worked with end user after the contract award. Shown above are the 556-RC and 762-RC suppressors.

The muzzle interface change does away with the pin and slot arrangement that could sometimes lead to a misaligned suppressor when the pin inside the suppressor indexed improperly on one of the open tines of a flash reducing muzzle device. The new system uses an alignment notch and tab that provides more positive engagement and simplifies the muzzle design since it’s ratcheting system is now entirely integrated into the suppressor itself. The older system relied on ratchet teeth that were cut into the end of the muzzle device.

The internals have also been optimized to further reduce muzzle flash. Suppressed carbines have a very small amount of muzzle flash, perhaps an inch or two that is barely visible as a dull flame to the naked eye. But, that small flash can still be observed, and is more noticeable when seen through image intensification optics. Alexander says the companies engineers reduced the amount of suppressor muzzle flash significantly while adding internal durability without affecting the original weight of the device.

20120523-214001.jpg
Above, the new alignment slot that replaces the older index pin inside the can’s mouth.

20120523-214132.jpg
Above, the new tab on SUREFIRE’s muzzle adapters that replaces the older u-shaped cutout.

20120523-214251.jpg
Above, the wider camming cuff and new integrated ratchet teeth.

Read More

The Department of the the Interior is buying 556 sets of Beyond’s PCU cold weather systems for the US Navy. I had no idea the Navy had a personal shopper.

Read More


George Solhan. I like this guy. He tells it like it is. He’s the Office of Naval Research’s deputy chief researcher for expeditionary maneuver warfare. He told Marine Corps Times that today’s armor requirement are overkill.

“A real warrior,” he said, “would like to go to combat with a weapon, a loin cloth and a light coat of oil.”

Most shots fired on Marines are made from a considerable distance. Additionally, there is no need for flak vests to be able to stop multiple .30-caliber armor-piercing rifle rounds at close range, as requirements dictate, he said. Marines seldom need that much protection so requirements should put more emphasis on constraining weight.

“It is dumb to have a requirement to stop armor piercing ammunition at muzzle velocity, and for multiple hits, when the probability of encountering that is almost zero. The probability of working your ass off and becoming fatigued and injury-prone and totally angered by the amount of weight you carry is 100 percent,” Solhan told Marine Corps Times in an interview May 3.

Read the rest of James Sanborn’s story from the NDIA-hosted, 2012 Marine Corps Systems Command and Program Executive Officer Land Systems Advance Planning Briefing for Industry (APBI) over on MarineCorpsTimes.com.

Read More

The US Army down selected the field of players in the Individual Carbine competition today. There are supposedly five companies left standing, though I haven’t been able to confirm any of them aside from Remington Arms. I’m not sure the champagne had even been corked from their last celebration after winning the contract to build 24k M4s carbines for the Army.

As it stands, Remington may end up the only real winner in the Army’s carbine replacement effort since it appears unlikely that the IC competition will produce a rifle that is head and shoulders above the M4 in the product improvement program track.

Read More

Here’s Josh Cutlip from Remington Defense giving an overview of changes made to the ACR as it was submitted in the Army’s Individual Carbine competition. The Remington Defense ACR is a military-only version of the Busmaster ACR.

 

Read More

We’ve updated our initial reporting on the contract award to include the delivery schedule and a little more background. Check it out here.

Remington has the following to say about the contract award:

US Army Awards M4 / M4A1 Carbine Contract to Remington Arms

4/24/2012 MADISON, NC – Remington Arms Company, LLC (“Remington”), a member of the Freedom Group family of companies, is pleased to announce the award of an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract for the procurement of a maximum of 120,000 M4/M4A1 carbines by the US Army Contracting Command in Warren, Michigan, on Friday, April 20, 2012.

“It is a great honor to be awarded this contract from the United States Army,” said John Day, Vice President, Remington Defense Division, former Marine, and Iraq War Veteran. “Our workforce is extremely proud to be adding this combat-proven carbine to the Remington Defense family alongside our combat-proven sniper rifles, suppressors and shotguns. We will produce these carbines with the same diligence, attention to detail, and quality that snipers and shooters worldwide expect from Remington.”

The M4 and M4A1 carbines are the US Army’s primary individual combat weapons and will be produced by Remington to the US Army’s M4 technical data package. The Army has initially ordered 24,000 M4A1 carbines from Remington; deliveries will start in September, 2013.

Read More

Yes, you could take that headline two ways… I just saw that a team of kinesiology researchers at the University of Massachusetts Amherst just received a 2.5-year, $975,000 grant through the Navy Health Research Center in the Department of Defense to study how the average 100-pound equipment load carried by soldiers affects their survivability, likelihood of injury and ability to carry out missions.

Have a look at the release from UMASS, AMHERST:

“Load is not a new issue for field commanders to consider,” says Van Emmerik, who is director of UMass Amherst’s Sensory-Motor Control Laboratory. “But while past studies typically focused on how load affects gait and the lower body, we will for the first time look at how the upper body, trunk and head coordinate in a soldier who is burdened by a heavy load, which is a fundamentally different and a more complex situation.”

Read More

The U.S. Army has been buying M4 carbines through an exclusive arrangement with Colt since 2002 (though the first Colt M4 contract was awarded in 1996). But, as of 18:20 today, Remington Arms has become the Army’s new supplier of M4/M4A1 carbines. According to Kevin Doell, spokesman for PM Soldier Weapons, the Army took its last delivery of Colt manufactured M4A1s in November, 2011 with no more deliveries outstanding.

According to the Department of the Army’s Chief of Legislative Liaison, the Army today executed a delivery order to buy 24,000 M4A1s worth $16,163,252.07. The rifles will be made at Remington’s factory in Ilion, N.Y., from the Colt technical data package and will cost about $673.10 a copy. That’s a significantly lower price than the final order of Colt produced M4A1s the government paid $1221 for in a 2010 contract.

Fedbizops.com lists the award with a contract award number W56HZV12D0056 but provides no links to the original solicitation. Doell confirms that this award was for the Army’s 2011 M4/M4A1 carbine W56HZV-10-R-0593 solicitation posted 6/14/2011.

John Day, Vice President, Remington Defense Division, confirmed the contract award. “We will produce these carbines with the same diligence, attention to detail, and quality that snipers and shooters worldwide expect from Remington,” Day said.

The order comes as line 001 on an IDIQ contract for up to 120,000 carbines worth $83,924,089.00, though U.S. Army Contracting Command lists the “Max Potential Contract Value $180,000,000.00.”

The delivery schedule has Remington producing 2000 M4 carbines a month. Remington’s first delivery of 1000 rifles is due in August, 2013, then 1475 are due a month later. After this two-month ramp up,  full rate production is expected at 2000 rifles delivered monthly through June, 2014 with a final delivery of 736 rifles in July, 2014.

The award comes as the first M4 carbine contract let after the US Army acquired the rights to Colt’s Technical Data Package in July, 2009. While the Army signed a 10-year exclusive contract with Colt in 1999 to produce the M4/M4A1, the Army does not own the TDP. But, the Army is now allowed to provide it to second sources of production under a licensing agreement that goes back to the original 1967 M16 contract. The M4 is a derivative of the M16.

George Kollitides, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Freedom Group and Remington Arms, said, “Over the past four years, we have made a substantial investment in Remington’s ability to compete in the government small arms space by modernizing our production facilities, focusing our research and development on end-user requirements, and ensuring consistent and repeatable quality in a high volume, high mix manufacturing environment.”

I haven’t heard from Colt, yet. But I expect them to be fairly quiet until the protest period has ended. I did speak with one industry executive Saturday morning that suggested Colt is already close to it’s production capacity. He mentioned Colt’s March, 2011, M240L machine gun contract award may have had an effect on the Army’s latest award decision. One of the criteria for the award  takes into account a manufacturer’s ability to meet a delivery schedule and the Army may view the M240L contract stretching Colt’s production resources.

Any of you that were about to buy milspec parts for your guns, now’s a good time. I’m sure Remington is about to go on an OEM parts buying binge. While they will likely forge their own upper receivers, lowers receivers, bolt, bolt carrier and barrels, they will have to subcontract for small parts such as ejectors, extractors, fire control groups, springs, and pins just as Colt does.

Read Remington’s press release after the break:

Read More

According to PEO Soldier, the Natick Labs entry is no longer being considered in the Army’s Phase IV camouflage program.

This is a very interesting development since it eviscerates the argument I’ve heard from industry that the Army is only performing Phase IV to find the lowest-cost alternative to its current arrangement with Crye Precision. If this were the case, then a government-developed and -owned pattern would have certainly saved the Army from buying a technical data package or paying royalties.

This leaves the entries from Crye Precision, Brookwood, ADS and Kryptek in the running.

From PEO Soldier’s spokesperson Debi Dawson:

“On Jan. 10th, the Army announced that families of camouflage patterns from one government team and four commercial vendors were selected to proceed into the next step of evaluations.

“As part of a cost savings strategy and as a result of initial assessments, the government submission is being removed from further consideration as a replacement to the universal camouflage pattern.

“This decision has been made in light of the similarity between elements of the government and one industry submission and the higher score of the industry submission during the initial evaluation.

“We are excited about the four vendor patterns we are going forward with. We anticipate experiencing very positive results in our field trials and more advanced computer evaluations. We will continue to work closely with our industry partners and our government team, especially in terms of research, development and evaluation. The Army conducts extensive testing to ensure we provide Soldiers with the very best clothing and equipment.”

Read More

Dan Lamothe over at Marine Corps times is reporting MARCORSYSCOM’s selection of the MARSOC pistol could happen by spring 2012. The contract authorizes the purchase of 400 to 12,000 weapons, though the current requirement calls for 4000 pistols for force reconnaissance and MARSOC Marines.

Officials with Marine Corps Systems Command, out of Quantico, Va., declined to characterize testing or identify which companies are competing for the contract. However, the Corps is in the final round of source selection, said Charles Clark III, head of weapons requirements at Marine Corps Combat Development Command, MARCORSYSCOM’s parent command. He declined further comment.

Read more from Marine Corps Times here.

Read More