<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Military Times GearScout &#187; UCP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/tag/ucp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout</link>
	<description>Bringing you the best tactical, off-duty gear and industry news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:13:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Army moving forward on camo. UCP Is dead.</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2010/12/13/army-moving-forward-on-camo-ucp-is-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2010/12/13/army-moving-forward-on-camo-ucp-is-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Curtis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/?p=7275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Army Times is reporting on last weeks Army Camouflage Improvement Industry Day in today&#8217;s paper. Lance Bacon attended the Dec. 9th event and heard from a range of Army officials speaking about the current and future camouflage programs. A revelation about the Army&#8217;s current camouflage pattern came from Maj. Brett Lord, from the Maneuver [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2010/12/13/army-moving-forward-on-camo-ucp-is-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s official: Army adopts MultiCam for use in OEF</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2010/02/22/its-official-us-army-adopts-multicam-for-use-in-oef/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2010/02/22/its-official-us-army-adopts-multicam-for-use-in-oef/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Curtis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Programatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multicam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO Soldier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/?p=4819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Updated: Now with more details from our Friday morning interview. According to Matt Cox at Army Times, the Army announced Friday morning that it will begin fielding MultiCam ACUs to forces flowing into Afghanistan as soon as this summer. Program officials told us explicitly that we would begin to see MultiCam fielding in August. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2010/02/22/its-official-us-army-adopts-multicam-for-use-in-oef/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CSA approves MultiCam for OEF</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2010/02/17/multicam-approved-for-oef/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2010/02/17/multicam-approved-for-oef/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Curtis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multicam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO Soldier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/?p=4807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Soldiersystems.net is reporting Gen. George Casey&#8217;s approval of a plan for the immediate fielding of MultiCam to soldiers in Operation Enduring Freedom. We haven&#8217;t yet gotten the official word but have no reason to doubt the report after confirming it with our own sources. We expect an announcement from the Army shortly. UPDATE: This one [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2010/02/17/multicam-approved-for-oef/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PEO Soldier updates camo briefing status via Twitter</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2010/02/14/peo-soldier-updates-camo-briefing-status-via-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2010/02/14/peo-soldier-updates-camo-briefing-status-via-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Curtis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Programatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multicam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO Soldier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/?p=4774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Someone posted this update to PEO Soldier&#8217;s Twitter feed via a mobile phone text message. I wonder if this was a meant for another recipient since all other posts to PEOSoldier&#8217;s account were made either from Twitter&#8217;s Web site or an iPhone application. The latest (as of last night) we&#8217;ve heard is that Gen. Casey [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2010/02/14/peo-soldier-updates-camo-briefing-status-via-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Backside of Natick Labs- Camo Calendar Edition</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2009/09/18/the-men-of-natick-labs-camo-calendar-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2009/09/18/the-men-of-natick-labs-camo-calendar-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Curtis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Programatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multicam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO Soldier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/?p=2895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are the twelve contenders that went up against UCP in Natick&#8217;s 2007-2009 Photosimulation Camouflage Detection test.  The five patterns at the bottom didn&#8217;t make the cut because they didn&#8217;t perform well enough to be considered, or were too similar to other patterns in the test. The Spec 4 patterns were specificaly DQ&#8217;d because their [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2009/09/18/the-men-of-natick-labs-camo-calendar-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Army&#8217;s Own Test Punks UCP</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2009/09/15/armys-own-test-punks-ucp/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2009/09/15/armys-own-test-punks-ucp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Curtis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Programatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO Soldier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/?p=2878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt Cox is reporting at ArmyTimes.com that the Army&#8217;s Natick labs performed a two-year study in 2007 that ranked UCP as the least effective universal camo pattern of the five patterns they tested. He FOIA&#8217;d the government for the Natick&#8217;s Photosimulation Camouflage Detection Test report and got it after PEO Soldier refused to provided it. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2009/09/15/armys-own-test-punks-ucp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deathmatch- Multicam vs. the Army&#8217;s Ego</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2009/09/14/deathmatch-multicam-vs-the-armys-ego/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2009/09/14/deathmatch-multicam-vs-the-armys-ego/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Curtis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Programatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hubris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multicam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/?p=2868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mirage, nope. All-over-brush, nope. AOR, nope. Matt Cox is reporting the Army has come up with a new camo pattern to address the deficiencies identified by congress and soldiers serving in Afghanistan. They&#8217;ve added coyote brown to the UCP pattern. The Army will test &#8220;UCP Delta&#8221;pattern, shown above, left,  along side Multicam, right,  in theater [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2009/09/14/deathmatch-multicam-vs-the-armys-ego/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deal$cout- Mystery Ranch Unloading ACU Packs</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2009/06/08/dealcout-mystery-ranch-unloading-acu-packs/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2009/06/08/dealcout-mystery-ranch-unloading-acu-packs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Curtis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Off-Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deal$cout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/?p=2033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s weird. I really thought this ACU UCP pattern would catch on. I mean if my neighbors are prancing around in Multicam bathrobes, why am I having such a hard time finding a UCP Speedo? At least I&#8217;m not alone in overestimating the longevity of the Army&#8217;s latest fad. Mystery Ranch, like Arc&#8217;teryx last week. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2009/06/08/dealcout-mystery-ranch-unloading-acu-packs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: militarytimes.com @ 2012-05-25 15:10:11 -->
