<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High-seas rescue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/11/19/high-seas-rescue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/11/19/high-seas-rescue/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:05:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Smith</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/11/19/high-seas-rescue/comment-page-1/#comment-1165</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=2863#comment-1165</guid>
		<description>I would say that they probably didn&#039;t think they could ransom some poor fishermen. Most of the ransom situations are substantial merchant ships from big companies.

Also, if it was a fishing trawler that was hijacked, then they might not have been wanting to return it for ransom. It could be that they needed a new mother ship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that they probably didn&#8217;t think they could ransom some poor fishermen. Most of the ransom situations are substantial merchant ships from big companies.</p>
<p>Also, if it was a fishing trawler that was hijacked, then they might not have been wanting to return it for ransom. It could be that they needed a new mother ship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

