<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Scoop Deck &#187; Andrew Tilghman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/author/atilghman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:07:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Iranians filming the Eisenhower?</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2010/05/04/iranians-filming-the-eisenhower/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2010/05/04/iranians-filming-the-eisenhower/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 16:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tilghman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign navies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maritime operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=4900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So what was that Iranian aircraft doing buzzing over the carrier Dwight D. Eisenhower last week? Filming it, according to the Iran&#8217;s naval chief. TEHRAN &#8211; An Iranian navy plane that came close to a US aircraft carrier in the Gulf was filming the vessel, the Fars news agency quoted Iran’s naval chief as saying [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2010/05/04/iranians-filming-the-eisenhower/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>F-35C Drop Testing video</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2010/04/15/f-35c-drop-testing-video/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2010/04/15/f-35c-drop-testing-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tilghman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=4645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check this out &#8212; one of the first F-35 carrier variants was &#8220;drop tested&#8221; recently down at a Lockheed Martin facility in Dallas. The first test flight for the F-35C is expected in May or June.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2010/04/15/f-35c-drop-testing-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;CAPT Titus ROCKS!!!!&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2010/01/18/capt-titus-rocks/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2010/01/18/capt-titus-rocks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tilghman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Officers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personnel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=3413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some friends of a fired CO are rallying support online. Check out this Facebook page named &#8220;Support Capt. John Titus,&#8221; in honor of the commanding officer of the Navy Supply Corps School who was relieved of command on Jan. 8. The page creators want people to send letters of endorsement to the chief of naval [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2010/01/18/capt-titus-rocks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A New Navy Term</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/11/16/a-new-navy-term/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/11/16/a-new-navy-term/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tilghman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life at Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maritime operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The deckplates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=2825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like the Navy has coined a new term. I heard it for the first time a couple of months ago when I was out on the Truman and talking to Rear Adm. Patrick Driscoll, the strike group&#8217;s commander. He was explaining how they would remain ready despite a six-month gap between the JTFX and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/11/16/a-new-navy-term/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navy&#8217;s top techie approves social media tools</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/10/23/navys-top-techie-approves-social-media-tools/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/10/23/navys-top-techie-approves-social-media-tools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tilghman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=2588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anybody see the Navy&#8217;s Chief Information Officer&#8217;s blog this week? Rob Carey, the Navy&#8217;s top techie, approves of sites like Facebook. 3. Social Media as a Tool to Build Trust. Social media is an inherent part of the toolbox for members of the millennial workforce, while baby boomers are just adopting it. Social media tools [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/10/23/navys-top-techie-approves-social-media-tools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EA-35? Not so fast.</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/10/23/ea-35-not-so-fast/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/10/23/ea-35-not-so-fast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tilghman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=2575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few weeks back, we wrote a story about the future of electronic attack aircraft in the Navy and Marine Corps. That story made a reference to preliminary talk of the Marine Corps eventually using the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter for electronic warfare. But I was over at the annual Electronic Warfare conference this past week [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/10/23/ea-35-not-so-fast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Ospreys work as the Navy&#8217;s new COD?</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/09/22/will-ospreys-work-as-the-navys-new-cod/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/09/22/will-ospreys-work-as-the-navys-new-cod/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tilghman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=2269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this week&#8217;s paper, we reported a story about how the Navy is thinking of making the V-22 Osprey the Navy&#8217;s next Carrier Onboard Delivery aircraft &#8212; colloquially known as the COD. I had a chance to speak to a C-2 pilot this weekend, as I flew from Norfolk out to the carrier Harry S. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/09/22/will-ospreys-work-as-the-navys-new-cod/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Silence is helping push for more Super Hornets</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/09/08/2091/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/09/08/2091/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tilghman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=2091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Barack Obama and Defense Secretary Robert Gates haven&#8217;t really said anything about the push to buy more F/A-18E/F Super Hornets. And that silence may be telling. Now that summer&#8217;s over, Congress is back in session this week.  And lawmakers may finally hammer out a deal allowing the Navy to buy a new batch of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/09/08/2091/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cool F-35 video</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/08/18/cool-f-35-video/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/08/18/cool-f-35-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tilghman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=1808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, Lockheed Martin conducted the first in-air refueling test for the F-35B (with a KC-130J tanker). Check out this video shot in the skies over Texas.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/08/18/cool-f-35-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fly a UAV with your iPhone</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/08/12/fly-a-uav-with-your-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/08/12/fly-a-uav-with-your-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tilghman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=1716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So check out this video &#8212; some of the geniuses up at MIT in Boston have developed an application for the iPhone that can fly a UAV. Just tilt the phone, and the plane moves. One of those geniuses was Missy Cummings, one of the Navy&#8217;s first female fighter pilots back in the early 1990s. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/08/12/fly-a-uav-with-your-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Navy&#8217;s F-35 rollout</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/07/28/the-navys-f-35-rollout/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/07/28/the-navys-f-35-rollout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tilghman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=1555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a photo from Forth Worth this afternoon, where Lockheed Martin rolled out its first F-35C, the carrier variant of the Joint Strike Fighter.  That&#8217;s Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary Roughead at the podium. Here&#8217;s a little background info. The F-35C will undergo some test flights up at Pax River in Maryland later this year, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/07/28/the-navys-f-35-rollout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New(?) report of delays for the F-35</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/07/23/new-report-of-delays-for-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/07/23/new-report-of-delays-for-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tilghman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=1458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Capitol Hill is buzzing about this report today from Congressional Quarterly: The Pentagon’s Joint Estimating Team, established to independently oversee the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program, determined that the plane won’t be able to move out of the development phase and into full production until 2016, rather than in 2014 as the program office has [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/07/23/new-report-of-delays-for-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will a new national defense strategy mean fewer planes?</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/07/23/will-a-new-national-defense-strategy-mean-less-planes/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/07/23/will-a-new-national-defense-strategy-mean-less-planes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tilghman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=1437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;ve been a lot of rumors swirling around Washington that the 50-year-old national defense strategy (being able to fight two big wars at the same time) is about to get canned in favor of a new one. Really? What happens if the senior-most military leaders decide that preparing for asymmetrical conflicts like Iraq and Afghanistan is more important than [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/07/23/will-a-new-national-defense-strategy-mean-less-planes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>F-22 may be the Navy&#8217;s best friend</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/07/15/f-22-may-be-the-navys-best-friend/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/07/15/f-22-may-be-the-navys-best-friend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tilghman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=1303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe Congress can only fight over one aircraft at a time. And these days, it&#8217;s not the Navy&#8217;s F/A-18 Super Hornet. Lawmakers have been quietly inserting millions of extra dollars into this year&#8217;s budget so the Navy can buy more Super Hornets &#8212; airplanes many say are needed to close the looming &#8220;fighter gap.&#8221; A [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/07/15/f-22-may-be-the-navys-best-friend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>F-35: Bells and whistles for all</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/15/f-35-bells-and-whisles-for-all/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/15/f-35-bells-and-whisles-for-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tilghman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign navies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is some pretty clever technology coming down the pike along with the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. Another reporter and I were wondering the other day about whether the U.S. is actually going to sell all of those bells and whistles to all of the eight foreign militaries that are also buying the F-35. So [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/15/f-35-bells-and-whisles-for-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Super Hornets? Part II</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/12/more-super-hornets-part-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/12/more-super-hornets-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tilghman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tailhook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday we heard rumors that legislators on Capitol Hill would tell the Navy to buy more Super Hornets &#8212; despite the fact the Navy has not formally asked for any. That&#8217;s no longer a rumor: Today Rep. Gene Taylor marked up the defense authorization bill to include permission for the Navy to enter into a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/12/more-super-hornets-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Super Hornets coming soon?</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/11/more-super-hornets-coming-soon/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/11/more-super-hornets-coming-soon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tilghman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take a look at this. &#8230;A reporter for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch thinks Congress is going to step in and force the Navy to buy more Boeing-made Super Hornets. (St. Louis is the home of Boeing headquarters) This comes as we’re hearing more about the size of the fighter gap. We’re going to keep an [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/11/more-super-hornets-coming-soon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Business trips or junkets?</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/11/business-trips-or-junkets/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/11/business-trips-or-junkets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tilghman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign navies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Officers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lots of times when Navy officials travel, they don’t actually pay for the trips. Instead, it&#8217;s business, associations and foreign governments that pick up the tab. Check out this site here that shows all the trips taken by Navy officials and who paid for them. Just plug in &#8220;Navy&#8221; or &#8220;Naval&#8221; in the &#8220;Base or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/11/business-trips-or-junkets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smoking crackdown?</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/09/smoking-crackdown/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/09/smoking-crackdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tilghman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No smoking, anywhere, anytime. That’s the new rule imposed last week at the U.S. Naval Hospital in Yokosuka, Japan. One sailor tells Scoop Deck that some khakis will be patrolling around on the edges of hospital property to make sure nobody is sneaking a smoke. “It’s crap” according to the sailor, who confessed to being [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/09/smoking-crackdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EA-18G&#8230;Grizzly?</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/09/ea-18ggrizzly/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/09/ea-18ggrizzly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 13:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tilghman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carriers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Navy&#8217;s newest jet as a new name.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/09/ea-18ggrizzly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A tug-of-war for naval aviation</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/08/a-tug-of-war-for-naval-aviation/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/08/a-tug-of-war-for-naval-aviation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tilghman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign navies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you think this year&#8217;s budget battle is a political showdown, check out this story here about turf war raging inside Britian&#8217;s defense world. The head of the Royal Air Force wants to take over all combat aviation, essentially taking over the Royal Navy&#8217;s fixed-wing fleet. Now try to imagine if someone made a suggestion [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/08/a-tug-of-war-for-naval-aviation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>X-Ray vision coming soon for JSF pilots</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/03/x-ray-vision-coming-soon-for-jsf-pilots/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/03/x-ray-vision-coming-soon-for-jsf-pilots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tilghman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pilots in the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter will be able to see through the walls and floor of their own plane, thanks to a new high-tech helmet that&#8217;ll make NVGs seem like your grand daddy&#8217;s bifocals. Check out this recently released video from Northrop Grumman that shows off the new system. (Jump ahead to about [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/03/x-ray-vision-coming-soon-for-jsf-pilots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On your Mom&#8217;s what?</title>
		<link>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/03/on-your-moms-what/</link>
		<comments>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/03/on-your-moms-what/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tilghman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ What does complacency sound like? I think I might have a transcript of it on my desk. We had a story in this week&#8217;s paper about a a couple of guys in a Super Hornet who completely missed the target range and ended up mistakenly dropping a 500-pound bomb in a national forest in Florida. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdeck/2009/06/03/on-your-moms-what/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
