"The days of science taking a back seat to ideology are over."

President Barack Obama pledged on Monday to return the United States to a "high water mark" of scientific achievement, announcing a goal to commit three per cent of GDP to research and development.

Obama laid out a deck of initiatives in a speech at the National Academy of Sciences, where he vowed to implement what he described as the largest-ever US investment in scientific research and a dramatic reversal of the ideology-driven policies of his predecessor George W Bush.

The clarion call for the country to regain its position as the world leader in scientific research and innovation came as the Obama administration faced its first major global health crisis with a deadly swine flu outbreak in Mexico and the United States that threatens to burst into a pandemic.

"At such a difficult moment, there are those who say we cannot afford to invest in science, that support for research is somehow a luxury at moments defined by necessities," Obama told hundreds of scientists, researchers and educators.

"I fundamentally disagree. Science is more essential for our prosperity, our security, our health, our environment and our quality of life than it has ever been."

Citing a plunge in federal funding of physical sciences over the past 25 years, Obama warned that US achievement, particularly science and math study, dramatically lagged in the late 20th century - and threatened to fall even further behind other rapidly advancing nations.

"I believe it is not in our American character to follow, but to lead. And it is time for us to lead once again," he said.

Obama also declared a need to end the politicisation of scientific research, a charge he has levelled at the Bush administration.

"We are restoring science to its rightful place," he said. "Under my administration, the days of science taking a back seat to ideology are over."

Obama pointed to the US goal set in the 1950s to reach space and its commitment to leading scientific innovation after the Soviet Union shocked the world by launching its Sputnik 1 satellite into space in 1957.

"That was the high water mark of America's investment in research and development. Since then our investments have steadily declined as a share of our national income," he said.

But Obama set a goal of devoting more than three per cent of US gross domestic product (GDP) to research and development.

"We will not just meet, but we will exceed the level achieved at the height of the space race through policies that invest in basic and applied research, create new incentives for private innovation, promote breakthroughs in energy and medicine, and improve education in math and science," he said.

As part of his massive $US787 billion ($A1.09 trillion) stimulus bill, Obama has committed $US21.5 billion ($A29.82 billion) for research and development, and his 2010 budget includes another $US75 billion ($A104.03 billion) to make research and experimentation tax credits permanent.

In his first months in office, Obama began peeling back some key Bush science policies, including the decision to limit federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.

Obama has also expressed deep concern over Bush's position on global warming, including his failure to ratify the Kyoto Protocol on climate change, and the president pulled no punches on Monday.

"We have watched as scientific integrity has been undermined and scientific research politicised in an effort to advance predetermined ideological agendas," Obama said.

"We know that our country is better than this."

Among Obama's commitments are doubling the budget of the National Science Foundation, which funds academic research, the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the Department of Energy's Office of Science.

He also outlined a $US5 billion ($A6.94 billion) Race To The Top fund to encourage states to improve the quality and quantity of math and science teachers.

Obama announced the launch of the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Energy, or ARPA-E, a $US400 million ($A554.82 million) initiative dedicated to "high-risk, high-reward research."

Obama touched on his recovery plan that includes investing $US150 billion ($A208.06 billion) over the next decade on renewable energy sources.

He also put forward his President's Council of Advisers on Science and Technology, a group of 20 scientists and engineers Obama said would advise him on "national strategies to nurture and sustain a culture of scientific innovation."

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

[Shrike]

It read well until that whole "global warming" and "Kyoto Protocol" part. I mean, talk about ideology!

[terry31]

Alternative energy sources are, I think,
and there is that direction which will deduce the world from crisis.
The epoch of oil and gas monopolies will end.

[kojack]

Originally Posted by Shrike

It read well until that whole "global warming" and "Kyoto Protocol" part. I mean, talk about ideology!

Agree 100 percent. The racist marxist hypocrite is now giving lessons on ideology. Guess "Rules for Radicals" isnt "ideology either obama.... The dems will go to a computer screen and print up another tril to put into circulation for the science research and our grandkids get screwed with the bill.

What new criminal attacks are being planned on America from inside the oval office?

Change, change, change....

[Merlin69]

About time this nation is turning around from the wasted opportunity we lost over Bush's science policies. Letting political heads of agencies make scientific policy without scientists having input was wrong of Bush to do.

Bravo President Obama!

[TravelMug79]

Are there any Obama supporters that are middle of the ground or do all of them just blindly laud everything he does?

I mean I see some good things that he does but come on...

Bush "W", Clinton, Bush "H. W.", they all had their ups and downs. These aren't your relatives, best friends, favorite baseball team or someone you even know really well but you come up to bat for them everytime someone says they screwed up with a justification you read in the paper or something. Think for yourself.

This is not directed specifially towards anyone here, just something I've observed.

This is something good though, I agree Merlin, politicians should have very little to say about quite a few things, scientific decisions being one of them. They need to pull their grubby little fingers out of every little aspect of our lives.